<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stylus vs. Finger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/</link>
	<description>All Things Mobile and Wireless</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-503619</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-503619</guid>
		<description>Did you ever follow up on your comments on granularity?  Two years on and with the continued march of touch interfaces and the possibly imminent arrival of an &quot;iPad&quot;, it would be interesting to think through the pros/cons of the finger (always &quot;handy&quot; ;-), not very accurate) and the stylus (familiar for writing, never where you left it, etc...).  I&#039;d be interested in others thoughts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever follow up on your comments on granularity?  Two years on and with the continued march of touch interfaces and the possibly imminent arrival of an &#8220;iPad&#8221;, it would be interesting to think through the pros/cons of the finger (always &#8220;handy&#8221; <img src='http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> , not very accurate) and the stylus (familiar for writing, never where you left it, etc&#8230;).  I&#8217;d be interested in others thoughts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-388632</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-388632</guid>
		<description>Patrick: As far as I am aware the human finger is the only, um, &quot;substance&quot; the iPhone/iPod touch screen is designed to work with. It does not work with a stylus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick: As far as I am aware the human finger is the only, um, &#8220;substance&#8221; the iPhone/iPod touch screen is designed to work with. It does not work with a stylus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-388505</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-388505</guid>
		<description>So what substance can be substitued for a finger on the apple Touch screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what substance can be substitued for a finger on the apple Touch screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-222871</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-222871</guid>
		<description>I have a Ipod tough and very large fingers.  I also wear gloves in the winter.

I find it extremely difficult to use the touch pad, particularly along the edges when the ipod is in a case.  with gloves on, it doesn&#039;t work at all.

Any pencil shaped aluminum or steel object will work as a stylus as long as it has a flat end, and is the size of a pencil or larger.  You can even use the flat end of a AAA battery.  Its a good idea to put a piece of tape over the end to avoid scratching the glass.  This keeps oily smudges off the screen as well.

I can write a e-mail much more quickly using the stylus.  IMO, the built-in text completer is useless to me, it guesses the wrong word 90% of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Ipod tough and very large fingers.  I also wear gloves in the winter.</p>
<p>I find it extremely difficult to use the touch pad, particularly along the edges when the ipod is in a case.  with gloves on, it doesn&#8217;t work at all.</p>
<p>Any pencil shaped aluminum or steel object will work as a stylus as long as it has a flat end, and is the size of a pencil or larger.  You can even use the flat end of a AAA battery.  Its a good idea to put a piece of tape over the end to avoid scratching the glass.  This keeps oily smudges off the screen as well.</p>
<p>I can write a e-mail much more quickly using the stylus.  IMO, the built-in text completer is useless to me, it guesses the wrong word 90% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin Kalinin</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-106441</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin Kalinin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-106441</guid>
		<description>You know, you can have on your Pocet PC the same contact management experience as on iPhone with FunContact VITO Technology has recently released. You can find it here: http://iWindowsMobile.com/contact-manager.html
With FunContact you can throw away the stylus altogether. Contact list is scrolled easily with fingers, you can do everything with fingers actually.

Look out for more software with iPhone like interface at http://iWindowsMobile.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, you can have on your Pocet PC the same contact management experience as on iPhone with FunContact VITO Technology has recently released. You can find it here: <a href="http://iWindowsMobile.com/contact-manager.html" rel="nofollow">http://iWindowsMobile.com/contact-manager.html</a><br />
With FunContact you can throw away the stylus altogether. Contact list is scrolled easily with fingers, you can do everything with fingers actually.</p>
<p>Look out for more software with iPhone like interface at <a href="http://iWindowsMobile.com" rel="nofollow">http://iWindowsMobile.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/comment-page-1/#comment-98001</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileviews.com/blog/2007/10/10/stylus-vs-finger/#comment-98001</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I can enter text far more quicky on my iPod touch than with a stylus on a PDA..either in keyboard or Handwriting recognition mode. Using my cellphone to write is so much of a pain I don&#039;t do it unless I really need to. It also makes you wonder why a cellphone without a qwerty keyboard should have an IM client on it. The person on the other end would have to watch text appear ONE.............WORD...............AT...........A..............TIME.

Since I have gotten used to the iPod Touch I really like the way it works for inputing text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I can enter text far more quicky on my iPod touch than with a stylus on a PDA..either in keyboard or Handwriting recognition mode. Using my cellphone to write is so much of a pain I don&#8217;t do it unless I really need to. It also makes you wonder why a cellphone without a qwerty keyboard should have an IM client on it. The person on the other end would have to watch text appear ONE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.WORD&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;AT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..A&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..TIME.</p>
<p>Since I have gotten used to the iPod Touch I really like the way it works for inputing text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

